Exposing the Bankruptcy of the Pro-Abortion Argument

Yesterday I commented on and linked to a ghastly article on salon.com written by Mary Elizabeth Williams. In it she asserts that unborn human beings do not have a right to life as compared to those stronger than them. Her final sentence of the article is the chilling conclusion that an unborn child is “a life worth sacrificing.”

This morning I have been listening to the January 29, 2013 podcast of Issues, Etc. from Lutheran Public Radio.

Scott Klusendorf

On this program, Scott Klusendorf shared his insight into Williams’ salon.com article, cutting down her rhetoric to expose the naked, post-modern power-play just beneath the surface.

I recorded some of his comments:

[Williams] is essentially saying there is one class of human beings that you can set aside and kill, and there’s another class you can’t. [We have] a marvelous opportunity to step up and say . . .

Listen, I believe that each and every human being has an equal right to life regardless of that human beings size, gender, race, level of development, or degree of dependency.

I believe that each and every human being has an equal right to life. [Williams] denies that central premise. She believes that only some humans have a right to life based on some accidental and fleeting thing that may come or go in the course of your lifetime, such as your dependency needs.

Which view, the pro-life view or the alleged “pro-choice” view does the better job of explaining human equality?

Lincoln argued that any way you argued for enslaving the black man will work equally well to enslave many whites, and you say man A is white, man B is dark, the white skin having the right to enslave the dark skin man, well take care because by that rule you’re a slave to the first person you meet who has skin fairer than your own.

It comes down to this: [Williams] says a fetus doesn’t have a right to life; therefore a fetus doesn’t have a right to life.

This is power politics; this isn’t any kind of rational argument… if there is indeed a class of human beings that can be set aside to be killed because they don’t meet her standard, you can’t just isolate out one victim class, namely the unborn, and say that doesn’t apply to anybody else.

If living independent is what gives us value, then those that depend on any kind of medical device forfeit their right to life, as do conjoined twins. There is no rational argument for why this applies only to the unborn, and not to anyone else.

We’ve really come this far. Don’t compromise with this type of monstrous worldview, my friends, but pray for our enemies.

Thanks for reading,

-Justin

Categories: Humankind in Distress, Understanding the Culture | Tags: , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Post navigation

2 thoughts on “Exposing the Bankruptcy of the Pro-Abortion Argument

  1. Killing your children is wrong.
    Your unborn child is one of your children.
    Therefore, killing your unborn child is wrong.
    (QED)

    Only a seared conscience is incapable of grasping this sort of logic.

  2. More precisely:

    1. It is wrong to kill another human being for personal reasons.
    2. A human zygote or fetus is a human being.
    3. Therefore, it is wrong to kill a human zygote or fetus for personal reasons.

    Furthermore,

    4. It is especially wrong to kill a human being to the degree that [1] she is innocent; [2] she is defenseless; [3] she has more to lose; [4] the killing is premeditated; [5] the killing is enabled by someone who is under a special duty to protect her.
    5. A human zygote or fetus is [1] as innocent and [2] as defenseless as a human being can be; a human zygote or fetus has [3] the most to lose in terms of the life she could still live; [4] abortion is always premeditated; [5] abortion is enabled by the mother, who has a special duty to protect her child at any early stage of development.
    6. Therefore, it is especially wrong, to the greatest degree possible, to kill a human being if she is a human zygote or fetus.

    Only repentance at the level of identity could rescue one from such a seared conscience.

So what are your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: